Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01100
Original file (BC 2014 01100.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01100

			COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO 


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Reentry (RE) code “4F” (Five or more days lost time during 
current enlistment) be changed to a “1” series to allow him to 
reenter the military.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His military record does not support restricting him from 
reenlisting in the United States military.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active 
Duty, reflects the applicant had lost time from 24 Feb 09 
through 9 Apr 09.   

On 20 Aug 10, the applicant was furnished an Honorable 
discharge, with a narrative reason for separation as “Completion 
of Required Active Service” with a separation code of “KBK” and 
a Reentry code of “4F.”  He was credited with 5 years, 11 
months, and 29 days of active service.   

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.    


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of 
an error or an injustice.  The applicant’s DD Form 214, 
Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, states he 
has 47 days of lost time.  Based on this lost time, his RE code 
is accurate.  Any component of the military can waive his RE 
“4F” code to allow him to reentry the military, if they chose 
to.  This code does not “bar” a member from reentering the 
military.  

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 22 Sep 14 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion 
the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-01100 in Executive Session on 16 Dec 14 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 5 Mar 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Excerpt from Military Personnel Record
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 7 May 14.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 Sep 14.

						





Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01004

    Original file (BC 2014 01004.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01004 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reentry (RE) code “2Q” (personnel medically retired or discharged) be changed to allow reentry in the military. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03119

    Original file (BC 2014 03119.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant did not receive a CJR and was not eligible to reenlist and was released from active duty after serving his initial four year enlistment. According to AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00009

    Original file (BC 2014 00009.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military personnel records indicate he enlisted in the Air Force Reserve on 24 Jan 14, for a period of three years. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPRs), which are attached at Exhibits C, D, E, and F. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPTOS recommends denial with respect to the applicant’s request for his lost time to be reinstated. A complete copy of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02639

    Original file (BC 2014 02639.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, reflects an RE code “2B” - Separated with a general or under-other-than-honorable-conditions (UOTHC) discharge.” The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00925

    Original file (BC 2014 00925.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AETC/SGPS finds no evidence of an error or an injustice. Based on the documentation on file in the applicant’s master personnel record, the discharge to include the SPD code, the narrative reason for separation and character of service was consistent with the procedural and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03718

    Original file (BC 2014 03718.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03718 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st Term, 2nd Term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) be changed so he can reenter the military. On 14 Nov 11, the applicant’s commander did not select him for reenlistment under the Fiscal Year 2012 Date of Separation Rollback Program. The remaining...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01640

    Original file (BC 2014 01640.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant was demoted based on his own action of underage drinking and again doing the same while still serving the suspended punishment for his first offense. We took notice of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03842

    Original file (BC 2014 03842.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    According to the applicant’s AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, dated 17 Nov 11, he was non-recommended for re-enlistment by his supervisor as a result of a quality force review conducted IAW the FY12 Enlisted DOS Rollback PDSM 11-94. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02111

    Original file (BC 2014 02111.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02111 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code of 2X meaning “1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment,” be changed to a code allowing reentry in the Service. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03060

    Original file (BC 2014 03060.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change his SPD code indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant has not provided any evidence of an error or injustice regarding the processing of his discharge. On 28 May 14, the...